It’s said that diversity recognizes that, though people have things in common with each other, they are also different many ways. Inclusion is where we see those differences as a benefit, and where we share perspectives and differences, leading to better decisions. It stands to reason, then, that it isn’t enough merely to desire to value diversity. One must also value inclusion. The two go hand in hand.
Yes, diversity was on full display. Scholars from various
colleges claimed diverse national and ethnic heritage. Skin colors of every hue
and tone and language families from the Far East, South Asia, North and South Africa,
Latin America, the Middle East, Europe, the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and
North America – I could name even more – could all be identified on the
walkways and streets. Proud parents, spouses, children in tow, siblings
jostling – all very familiar – all common in every culture.
But then there was a marked symbol of inclusion – the formal
attire of the Cambridge scholar – known as Sub-fusc. Sub-fusc (meaning
dark and dusky color) refers to clothes worn with full academic dress involving
a dark suit and white shirt, collar, bands and bow tie for men (who
must also wear black socks), and a dark suit and white blouse for women. The
rules for dress on graduation for women also specify that women's attire must
have long sleeves. Although only male graduands are required to wear white ties
and bands by regulation, nothing prevents female graduands doing so too if
they wear a properly collared shirt. Over this, of course, is the gown and the
hood, which signifies your “college” and degree (rank and area of study). Everyone
wears the same, regardless of national, racial, or ethnic identity. The only
distinction on this occasion is your achievement.
Perhaps it is too idealistic to think that we might strive
for this in our society. That we might strive to put into practice the teaching
of one our modern-day prophets who taught so earnestly, “I have a dream that
my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be
judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."
(Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.)
Perhaps, we Americans, who claim to espouse a society based
on liberty and equality, on diversity and inclusion could learn from our
British “cousins,” where disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil
partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion and belief, sex and sexual
orientation are 'protected characteristics' covered by discrimination law to
give people protection against being treated unfairly. Perhaps it is time to
put into practice what we, as Anglicans/Episcopalians affirm our in own
Baptismal Covenant and answer affirmatively to the question: Will you strive
for justice and peace among all people and respect the dignity of every human being?
with these words: I will, with God’s help. Perhaps with God’s help
making our voices heard in the cause of diversity and inclusion in our society
might bring the values of the kingdom of God just a bit closer to reality.